[icinga-devel] Featrues of NRPE

Marcel Hecko maco at blava.net
Tue Sep 14 23:16:30 CEST 2010


Is integrating base checks directly into nrpe a good idea? The
portability of NRPE would go rapidly down as there are many different
systems where we use NRPE and many of them are not POSIX compatible.

Marcel

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Mike Becker
<webmaster at redpeppersworld.de> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> as i want to Improve NRPE i had some things in mind that i want to add:
> - - Integrated base Checks (e.g. CPU , Load , RAM, Disks, Processes)
> - - full SSL Support ( Connections will not be Encrypted by a 512 Bit
> Diffle-Hellman Key instead using TLSv1 Certificates)
> - - with the SSL Support i also want to get rid of another security issue.
> I mean the Authentication of a NRPE Client (check_nrpe) on a NRPE
> Daemon. I'm thinking about a PKI Structure or another x.509 Based
> Certificate Auth.
>
> I would like to hear if you agree with me and what you would like to
> have in NRPE
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkyP5P8ACgkQSLHJdpwJ3/m95QCcDQdCslMgsid8rrpe6HaElgY4
> ggAAn1GgNh/+OpJZ6DZTpy9X392Yzx+q
> =OpNO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> icinga-devel mailing list
> icinga-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-devel
>



-- 

------------------------------------------------------
This message is not intended to have
contractual effect
------------------------------------------------------




More information about the icinga-devel mailing list